An explanation off Seymour due to the fact an actual physical organization almost shows Buddy’s undoing
/. Pal would be the earliest so you’re able to acknowledge that the poems remove something-a great deal -into servicios de citas para adultos the “interpretation by the paraphrase.” Nevertheless trend is obvious: unsentimentalized small times away from significant lights or epiphany; carefully engraved vignettes hence inform you the “religious method” according to the externals. Since a critic, Seymour is actually depicted using their opinions toward enough Pal’s stories, while the essence of his pointers are summed up in two concerns he tells Buddy he’s going to be requested once the an author as he passes away: “Was indeed your primary celebs away? Were you active creating your center aside?” Though Seymour’s inquiries, eg his poems, cannot really feel paraphrased, he generally seems to advise that opinion and you may perception -within their strongest senses -should be involved in great creating; and also for the reader it become those individuals evasive, indefinable functions that are profoundly swinging and you will smoking cigarettes. When he goes through a catalogue of Seymour’s bodily attributes – locks, ears, eyes, nostrils, sound, facial skin, outfits – he becomes progressively more invasive much less defined, sometimes, seem to, painfully close disintegration (such as for example, the guy declares immediately after a short passage toward Seymour’s ears, “I will bed. . . . Both hands try sweat, the newest bowels churning. The newest Included Child is simply not yourself”). “Seymour: An intro” looks not so much a narrative since an enthusiastic assemblage out of cards, findings, stories, and you will irrelevancies (“flowering parentheses”), much like Buddy’s (or Salinger’s) record, of which a story you’ll one day be made. The newest Seymour you to definitely emerges could be consistent with the Seymour i have come knowing already; the fresh procedure was shown, the brand new complexities found, however, zero undoubtedly the fresh new dimensions are added to their portrait. In such a way, upcoming, the story is actually Friend’s, as we get a hold of him the very first time in all their misery out-of heart trying to keep and you can 41
On facts, references are manufactured, like to the works one Friend provides created, that force which personality
reinforce his learn towards challenging facts lurking into the Seymour’s lifestyle. He looks in eager necessity of him or her. He introduces themselves initially, with irony, because the an enthusiastic “ecstatically pleased guy”; at the conclusion, as he makes to go to class, he realizes that “no situation” the guy do are “more critical than simply entering that terrible Area 307.” Since the Seymour just after said, “all the i would the whole lifestyle was change from that little bit of Holy Floor to another.” “Seymour: An intro” may be considered have the means one hides setting, together with the appearing irrelevancies purposely designed to carry out a level greater than common impression out of facts – the real reality (a method, in addition, not uncommon, just like the experience Dostoevski’s “Notes of Underground” otherwise Rilke’s The notebook from Malte Laurids Brigge). But, however, discover a lingering question regarding author’s control, any doubt that’s quite reinforced by Pal’s perennial similarity in order to Salinger. Certainly Friend’s works is obviously The latest Catcher regarding the Rye, one or two other people are “Raise Large brand new Roof Ray, Carpenters” (where Friend was narrator) and you will “The ultimate Go out to own Bananafish” (and he wasn’t), nonetheless various other is actually “Teddy” (Friend also estimates of it). Instance facts since these while others do not, naturally, show anything, nonetheless they manage suggest – and only recommend – you to Salinger is discussing, however obliquely, his or her own loss of manage and you may diffusion out of ability. Salinger’s much time silence pursuing the appearance of “Seymour: An introduction” within the 1959 is actually ended when you look at the 1965 towards the publication of another chapter throughout the Glass saga, “Hapworth 16, 1924.” So it story performed absolutely nothing to guarantees those who hoped-for a great come back to the sooner brilliance regarding Catcher on the Rye. Actually, it tended to accentuate those people features of your later work and this really members discovered troubling- a monotonous size, a humor have a tendency to care about-consciously sweet, a muting of narrative in favor of philosophical asides. But in spite 42