Attorney Mary Joseph warned one [W]e has claimed a fight, yet not the war
As a result, after that Immigration Minister Lucienne Robillard launched during the January 1999 recommended change towards immigration legislation and you can rules to provide lesbian and you can gay lovers regarding members of the family category conditions
46 Joseph, along with a great many other commentators, thought that the greater battle involved depriving them of the brand new discretionary power supplied to immigration officials and then make nearest and dearest reunification to own gay men and lesbians the main law think its great is actually for hitched heterosexual couples.47
Comparable questions was basically increased by Immigration Legislative Remark Advisory Class (Advisory Class) within the 1997 declaration called Not just Number: An effective Canadian Build for Immigration.forty-eight The newest Advisory Class shown matter you to definitely lgbt candidates is actually reliant abreast of the fresh lower than uniform application of unpublicized management directives.49 Inside indicating your definition of lover getting amended so you can tend to be same-sex partners, the newest Consultative Classification reported that the intention of the family reunification provisions will be visibility, fairness and you may equivalence off cures, and you can [that] such need to be enshrined in-law.fifty So it testimonial echoed one to built in 1994 from the users to a national visit to your immigration from household members which recommended the federal government to supply gay men and you may lesbians immigration support liberties comparable to those of heterosexual married couples.51 For the majority immigration advocates, the time had come to expand the word loved ones in order to echo both the evolving idea of nearest and dearest inside the Canadian residential law, and the